Macroeconomics and microeconomics were discussed for years without focusing specifically on the individual. Moving towards a context that would be necessary to overcome current problems implies for some persons to focus on the economic behavior of people and for others to respond to their economic needs. In principle, both positions complement each other, the first is based on knowledge and the second on know-how. Nanotechnology makes innovations by building with atoms and molecules. Such is its current development that within a very small nanoparticle, for example 10nm, it can locate and individualize each atom in 3D images.
It brings to light what was invisible up to now. The
nanoeconomy makes the needs of each person visible, individualizing them and
giving the necessary answers. Today, a law, a decree, or a resolution can
benefit a certain number of people, not affect to others, and harm others.
There is no real concern to make the problem of each individual visible, knowing
how much he needs to live with dignity, considering what is necessary to have
housing, food, transportation, health protection, etc. Then groups together
those with similar needs and acts accordingly. Nanotechnology makes visible those people who were not until now. The question is: Why aren't they? When you use
a microscope you select the magnification according to what you need or want to
observe. It is evident that the currently adrift economic construction started
from top to bottom, macro, micro, ... It is unnatural because it never took
into account the laws of nature, achieving not only a global economy but also
an exponential environmental destruction. We are
inevitably getting closer to the nanoeconomy, with the need to reverse the
order from the bottom up, from individual needs to a micro and macro, focused on the needs of
people and not on arbitrary legislation.
It is time to incorporate the third leg into
microeconomics and macroeconomics, it is time to make visible the needs of all
the members of the planet, it is time for nanoeconomics.
Complementary reading:
