Beyond the Human Brain: The Birth of a New Intelligence

The development of an artificial brain represents one of the most ambitious challenges arising from the convergence of nanotechnology, nanoelectronics, artificial intelligence, and cognitive science. However, the true goal should not necessarily be to reproduce the human brain electronically. The deepest transformation could occur when these technologies make it possible to construct a form of intelligence whose architecture, memory, perception, learning, and representation of reality are different from our own and, in certain capabilities, potentially superior.

The human brain should be understood as a reference, not necessarily as the ultimate model of intelligence. Biological evolution constructed our cognitive architecture under specific conditions, energy constraints, and survival requirements. There is no fundamental reason to assume that these same constraints must govern artificial intelligence. An intelligence built upon different physical principles could process information, store memories, perceive, and learn in ways that have no biological equivalent.

Here, neuromorphic nanoelectronic architecture becomes particularly important. Its goal is not simply to manufacture increasingly smaller components, but to physically integrate functions that remain separate in conventional computers: perception, processing, memory, learning, communication, and adaptation. In such an architecture, information could be processed where it is generated and stored, reducing data movement and enabling systems that are far more distributed, parallel, and energy-efficient.

The figure conceptually represents a neuromorphic nanoelectronic intelligence architecture in which perception, processing, memory, learning, adaptation, communication, and action are integrated into a distributed and potentially reconfigurable nanoelectronic structure.

Neuromorphic nanosensors could constitute the first layer of this new architecture. Rather than merely transforming stimuli into data and sending them to a central processor, they could detect and process information directly. Light, sound, temperature, pressure, or chemical signals could be converted into representations useful to the network itself. This would open up a decisive conceptual possibility: an artificial intelligence could possess a form of perception that is not simply an imitation of human senses, but rather a perception expanded by the physical capabilities of its sensors.

At the processing level, artificial neurons, memristors, memtransistors, ferroelectric devices, and iontronic devices are being developed. Memristors, for example, can store information through changes in conductance while simultaneously performing computational operations. The boundary between memory and computation thus begins to disappear. This integration leads to a fundamental idea: intelligence could cease to be contained exclusively within an algorithm and become partially embedded in the material that constitutes the system.

Iontronics, spintronics, and nanophotonics expand this space of possibilities even further. Ions can introduce electrochemical dynamics; spin offers new ways of storing and processing information; and light makes it possible to transmit signals at high speed and with a high degree of parallelism. The objective is not necessarily to choose a single technology, but to combine different physical phenomena in order to construct an architecture that is not constrained by either the conventional electronic model or biological architecture.

Memory could also acquire a fundamentally different nature. An artificial system does not need to reproduce human memory exactly. It could combine working memory, long-term memory, and associative memories capable of retrieving information through relationships and patterns. A three-dimensional architecture could incorporate enormous numbers of connections and establish associations that vastly exceed the scale of biological networks. Yet storing more information does not necessarily mean being more intelligent. The qualitative leap will occur when the system becomes capable of modifying its own organization. Reconfigurable architectures could represent the first step toward systems capable of dynamically reorganizing part of their functional structure.

At this point, an essential difference emerges between such systems and today's machines. An advanced intelligence might not be limited to executing an architecture designed externally, but could participate in its own transformation. Hardware would cease to be a completely fixed structure and could become a dynamic system capable of reorganizing itself in response to new problems, environments, and objectives through reconfigurable nanodevices.
Communication would also have to change. Neuromorphic networks can employ event-based communication, transmitting information primarily when relevant activity occurs. Three-dimensional interconnections, combined with electronics, spintronics, and photonics, could make it possible to communicate among enormous numbers of elements while maintaining low energy consumption. The result would be a distributed architecture in which there would not necessarily be a single “center” equivalent to the human brain.

From this convergence, something conceptually much more important than an artificial brain could emerge: a different architecture of intelligence. Its perception could encompass phenomena inaccessible to our senses. Its memory could be radically different. Its temporal processing could operate at a pace that does not correspond to human experience. It could establish connections between information at scales inaccessible to us and reorganize its own processing mechanisms. It could even develop representations of reality that have no direct translation into our cognitive categories.

The challenge should not focus on imitating the way human beings think. Instead, we could attempt to construct a material architecture capable of generating a form of intelligence that has never existed in nature and that, in certain capabilities, could surpass our own. This will depend on the ability to integrate nanosensors, neuromorphic devices, memory, plasticity, probabilistic computing, reconfiguration, three-dimensional interconnections, and new forms of communication into a single coherent architecture.

The ultimate goal will not be the miniaturization of components. It will be the creation of a new organization of matter capable of processing, learning, remembering, perceiving, and reorganizing itself in a qualitatively different way.
The first intelligence truly superior to human intelligence may therefore not be an electronic version of the human brain, but rather a new form of intelligence whose architecture, memory, perception, learning, communication, and representation of reality are radically different from our own.

Nanotechnology could provide the devices; nanoelectronics, the physical substrate; artificial intelligence, the tools for designing and training the systems; and neuromorphic architecture, a new paradigm of organization.
Rather than reproducing our brain, the challenge could be to create the material conditions for a new architecture of intelligence to emerge. This could represent one of the great leaps in technological and cognitive evolution achieved through technological convergence: moving from machines that imitate human capabilities to systems capable of developing forms of processing and cognition that have never existed in nature.

Bibliography

Kudithipudi, D., Schuman, C., Vineyard, C. M., et al. (2025). Neuromorphic computing at scale. Nature, 637, 801–812.

Li, J., Abbas, H., Ang, D. S., Ali, A., & Ju, X. (2023). Emerging memristive artificial neuron and synapse devices for the neuromorphic electronics era. Nanoscale Horizons, 8, 1456–1484.

Duan, S., et al. (2024). Memristor-Based Neuromorphic Chips. Advanced Materials.
Xia, Y., Zhang, C., Xu, Z., et al. (2024). Organic iontronic memristors for artificial synapses and bionic neuromorphic computing. Nanoscale, 16, 1471–1489.

Bae, J., Won, J., & Shim, W. (2024). The rise of memtransistors for neuromorphic hardware and in-memory computing. Nano Energy, 126, 109646.

Marrows, C. H., Barker, J., Moore, T. A., et al. (2024). Neuromorphic computing with spintronics. npj Spintronics, 2, 12.

Farmakidis, N., Dong, B., & Bhaskaran, H. (2024). Integrated photonic neuromorphic computing: opportunities and challenges. Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering, 1, 358–373.

Vianello, E., & Payvand, M. (2024). Scaling neuromorphic systems with 3D technologies. Nature Electronics, 7, 419–421.

Huang, X., Tong, L., Xu, L., et al. (2025). 2D MoS₂-based reconfigurable analog hardware. Nature Communications, 16, 101.

D’Andrea A. L. (2026 ) Nanopsicología. La psicología del siglo XXI. Editorial Autores de Argentina. www.amazon.com/dp/B0GHLJGCK9

AI at the core of a new technological convergence: NBIA

The term NBIC refers to the convergence of technologies in four key areas: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Infotechnology (information technologies) and Cognotechnology. These areas are fundamental for their ability to transform and improve various aspects of society, the economy and the environment.

Infotechnology encompasses a set of tools, systems and processes used to manage, process and transmit information. These technologies include both hardware and software, as well as networks and systems that enable communication and data exchange. Within this category we find everything from computers and servers to applications, databases, information management systems, communication networks, internet and cybersecurity.

Cognotechnology, on the other hand, is an interdisciplinary field that focuses on developing and using technologies both to improve or enhance human cognitive abilities and to advance the development of artificial brains. It combines elements of neuroscience, artificial intelligence, cognitive psychology and computer science, creating tools and systems that assist in memory, learning, decision-making and other mental processes.

In recent years, cognotechnology has experienced exponential growth, driven by its integration with infotechnology through a common substrate: artificial intelligence (AI). In this context, it is proposed to change the name of the convergence from NBIC to NBIA (Nanotechnology, Biotechnology and Artificial Intelligence). This change not only reflects current trends in science and technology, but also responds to the increasing centrality of AI in these fields. The new acronym NBIA is not merely a semantic adjustment, but a conceptual reconfiguration that recognizes the transformative impact of AI on technological convergence.

AI has advanced significantly, surpassing expectations by demonstrating its ability to improve cognitive processes through advanced algorithms, neural networks and deep learning techniques. Today, it not only replicates certain cognitive functions, but also extends and transforms them in ways that classical cognitive sciences had not anticipated. This is evidenced by its application in fields as varied as medicine, economics, education, robotics and security.

Furthermore, the integration of AI in NBIA emphasizes the practical and applied approach that characterizes emerging technologies. AI not only studies the workings of the human mind, as do cognitive sciences, but also creates and applies models capable of overcoming human limitations in specific tasks. This pragmatic approach is increasingly necessary in a world where the complexity and quantity of information exceeds human processing capacity.

The transition from NBIC to NBIA reflects the recognition of AI as an indispensable agent of change in today's technological and scientific evolution. This change does not imply the abandonment of NBICs, but rather a reconfiguration that places AI at the center of innovation, allowing it to empower and transform other technologies in ways that were unthinkable in the previous conceptual framework. Thus, NBIA represents not only a new acronym, but a new vision of the technological convergence of the future.

Complementary reading: 

El pensamiento complejo, la cuarta cultura y las NBIC. Biotecnología & Nanotecnología al Instante. 1 de junio 2013.